Duluth lawyer reacts to Supreme Court ruling on blood draw

Remaining Ad Time Ad - 00:00

DULUTH, MN — On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in saying officers can draw blood when a motorist, suspected of impaired driving is unconscious.

The question before the Supreme Court had to do with what happens when a motorist suspected of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol is unconscious, generally as a result of a crash.

Wisconsin law said that in that case, blood can be drawn even without a warrant. Lawyers for the driver argued drawing blood was in violation of the Fourth Amendment because it prohibits against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Brent Olson a Criminal Defense and DWI lawyer, says he understands it is a compelling topic, but balance is needed.

“In exchange for your ability to operate on public roadways, implicitly you consent to having your blood-alcohol tested when you’re suspected of drinking and driving. The line that is always drawn is freedom and safety, and we kind of have to have a balance of those things all the time,” said Olson.

Olson says it was unusual for the Supreme Court to take up this case after ruling on a similar one three years ago in North Dakota, where they decided on warrant-less breath samples.

As for what’s next, going forward Olson says the Supreme Court ruling means one more piece of evidence to analyze during similar cases.

Emma Quinn

Emma Quinn

TOP STORIES

KBJR 6 Weather Authority

Ashland
72°
Hayward
70°
Superior
Hibbing
63°
International Falls
61°
Grand Marais
64°
Ironwood
72°
Siren
70°
Solon Springs
66°
Munising
70°
Brainerd
71°
Bemidji
Aitkin
63°
Silver Bay
57°
Cloquet
61°
Cook
66°
Ely
64°
Grand Rapids
66°
Mora
64°
Moose Lake
Orr
63°
Two Harbors
57°
Hinckley
68°
Connect with KBJR 6
Top Stories
Scroll to top
Skip to content