Duluth lawyer reacts to Supreme Court ruling on blood draw

Remaining Ad Time Ad - 00:00

DULUTH, MN — On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in saying officers can draw blood when a motorist, suspected of impaired driving is unconscious.

The question before the Supreme Court had to do with what happens when a motorist suspected of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol is unconscious, generally as a result of a crash.

Wisconsin law said that in that case, blood can be drawn even without a warrant. Lawyers for the driver argued drawing blood was in violation of the Fourth Amendment because it prohibits against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Brent Olson a Criminal Defense and DWI lawyer, says he understands it is a compelling topic, but balance is needed.

“In exchange for your ability to operate on public roadways, implicitly you consent to having your blood-alcohol tested when you’re suspected of drinking and driving. The line that is always drawn is freedom and safety, and we kind of have to have a balance of those things all the time,” said Olson.

Olson says it was unusual for the Supreme Court to take up this case after ruling on a similar one three years ago in North Dakota, where they decided on warrant-less breath samples.

As for what’s next, going forward Olson says the Supreme Court ruling means one more piece of evidence to analyze during similar cases.

Emma Quinn

Emma Quinn

TOP STORIES

KBJR 6 Weather Authority

Ashland
42°
Hayward
40°
Superior
42°
Hibbing
37°
International Falls
38°
Grand Marais
43°
Ironwood
40°
Siren
40°
Solon Springs
39°
Munising
48°
Brainerd
42°
Bemidji
35°
Aitkin
36°
Silver Bay
41°
Cloquet
39°
Cook
37°
Ely
39°
Grand Rapids
38°
Mora
37°
Moose Lake
Orr
37°
Two Harbors
41°
Hinckley
43°
Connect with KBJR 6
Top Stories
Scroll to top
Skip to content